From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Luke A. Guest Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: disruptors of & inventory of Ada compilers and latest their era of ISO8652 compliance Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 16:56:00 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <1103700103.548265160.819002.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> References: <9169bb0d-626f-4f6d-82c9-8a9b7543a084@googlegroups.com> <92b78739-e2c5-4e45-bbd8-f80ec4918691@googlegroups.com> <6dc39990-16eb-4717-8b8a-1d41c2767530@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 1uqhFiWigmvIPnCyFuypQg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: NewsTap/5.3.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.3 Cancel-Lock: sha1:RHeI04AJ5hInJ+9P6ngdEyfrV4o= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52389 Date: 2018-05-17T16:56:00+01:00 List-Id: Dan'l Miller <@verizon.net> wrote: Darwin, the BSDs, and Linux. I wonder why the design of an LLVM IR backend for GCC wasn't merely just another machine-code downstream from GIMPLE, e.g., as (hardware-processor machine-code ISAs are) overviewed at https://kristerw.blogspot.com/2017/08/writing-gcc-backend_4.html See previous discussions about taking gcc’s ir and the ramifications of doing so, it makes the resultant code gplv3. It’s in the gcc faq and licence. > On this note, does anyone know how much GNAT's frontend GNAT IR -> generic -> gimple, but I think they got rid of the generic step but I’m not sure.