From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff1f0403676a2300
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.24.165 with SMTP id v5mr1518452wif.1.1344882503633;
        Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 q11ni113245934wiw.1!nntp.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Networking (General/Design)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:28:22 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <10yohwt5tzu1n.11rwucf3x0mua.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <08540a65-8d88-4042-b021-52c49b2e6772@googlegroups.com>
 <fi6nymfk59lc.v49zgtg4rb7e$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <2de69490-cbc2-4f58-af8a-db5bee3fd665@googlegroups.com>
 <df59f1e0-786c-4012-ae8b-d8f518c0a5dc@googlegroups.com>
 <axw5uj8bm4pt.vnr051uyljn7$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <14f67cad-6b56-4c62-acbd-0c9488a4676b@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9A8bJrx4NhDLcSmbrb6AdA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-13T20:28:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:54:35 -0700 (PDT), Marc C wrote:

> On Monday, August 13, 2012 8:31:31 AM UTC-5, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:12:23 -0700 (PDT), Marc C wrote:
>> 
>>> Among them are ZeroMQ (http://www.zeromq.org),
>> Does this really implement protocols, e.g. DLMS, ModBus etc?
> 
> Nope, ZeroMQ is essentially just a transport layer,

I see. Then it is probably not what the OP wanted.

BTW, did you evaluate the distributed systems Annex vs. this stuff? I am
interested in an opinion, because we are using other technology, so that I
had no opportunity to evaluate the Annex. Was it too heavy-weight for you?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de