From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c15063243269efcd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Meet the new GPS...same as the old GPS... References: <1151320748.360707.79490@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com> <4gag1vF1lgt2gU1@individual.net> <1151343516.598780.72970@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <6zodwfokko.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <1151438643.540118.175130@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <878xnint7n.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> From: M E Leypold Date: 28 Jun 2006 01:09:46 +0200 Message-ID: <10veqmmc05.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.243.222 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1151449412 88.72.243.222 (28 Jun 2006 01:03:32 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5149 Date: 2006-06-28T01:09:46+02:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta writes: > randomm@mindless.com writes: > > I'm confused at the differences between gcc ada (which they seem to > > call GNAT and use all the same commands- gnatmake, gnatbind, etc.) and > > ACT's GNAT. Why are there two Ada compilers (front-ends?) with the > > same names? > > They are in fact the same compiler; see But not any more as I understand it? Or am I being mistaken that ACT stopped contributing to the FSF tree some time ago and the fork is permanent now? (and know, don't flame me anyone, it is/was their right to stop if they did. I only want know wether there is an actual fork now, or wether my information is wrong). > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Installing Regards -- Markus