From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,995653e833a2d91c
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: With Exceptions Disabled On Windows,
 How Can I Determine Where A  Software Interrupt Occurs
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <7091f995-dd7e-4442-8ca5-158b83e50bec@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
 <4ade0003$0$966$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>
 <h3ks3nu7xbl5.p1s8f9qaj5vr.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4ade04dc$0$949$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:04:36 +0200
Message-ID: <10hvfezl7sqga$.8j87mxmxk66.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Oct 2009 21:04:32 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: eefe7431.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=9;]R;7eZ^M2^8FBo0_81f>4IUK<Cl32<14Fo<]lROoR18kF<OcfhCO;hNceX548496[6LHn;2LCV>[<mhadbfdU;o:S1;lB[hV2edi=^432nN9
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8759
Date: 2009-10-20T21:04:32+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:43:56 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:

> Le 20/10/2009 20:37, Dmitry A. Kazakov a �crit :
>> Though the subject's text could be read as if the OP meant the case when
>> the corresponding check were suppressed. I.e.,.how do we detect something
>> that does not occur... (:-))
> 
> I hadn't read that this way. But if the checks are suppressed then we 
> will get a signal for divide by 0 and we should get a proper backtrace 
> in this case with GNAT.

That depends on the hardware. But if zero divide indeed generates a
hardware interrupt, then, it is reasonable to suggest that the pragma
Suppress will have no effect on Constraint_Error propagation.

In which sense, the *software* (so the OP writes) exceptions were
"disabled"? Did he mean so-called Windows "Structured Exceptions"?

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de