From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c90a:: with SMTP id t10mr35219556jao.19.1546456867578;
        Wed, 02 Jan 2019 11:21:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d607:: with SMTP id n7mr569049oig.1.1546456867316;
 Wed, 02 Jan 2019 11:21:07 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.215.MISMATCH!k10no71203itk.0!news-out.google.com!v71ni99ita.0!nntp.google.com!k10no71200itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:21:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <q0gjbo$1atg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.77.182.20;
 posting-account=W2gdXQoAAADxIuhBWhPFjUps3wUp4RhQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.77.182.20
References: <30ba8954-a19e-4c95-b350-798b0276db41@googlegroups.com>
 <q0e2m8$t6b$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <q0f98v$1hf2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <38103aef-2528-41ae-bb29-eec551a64808@googlegroups.com>
 <q0gjbo$1atg$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <10d98401-d974-459f-93ed-e0b315b414e8@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada grammar rules for names too permissive?
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:21:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55167
Date: 2019-01-02T11:21:06-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 12:42:36 PM UTC-8, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On 2019-01-01 20:49, Stephen Leake wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 1, 2019 at 12:44:17 AM UTC-8, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> >> The grammar as written is never the one actually used for whatever
> >> purpose other than explanation or, maybe, validation. An extreme case
> >> illustrating why, is source code coloring,
> > 
> > On the contrary, Emacs Ada mode source code coloring uses a generated parser for the Ada language, with only minimal changes from Annex P.
> 
> In which case it should not work with syntactically incorrect programs.

No, it has error correction to deal with that.