From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9de425d0eee7b58 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!e20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Gautier write-only Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does GNAT GPL 2010 have C++? Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <10d35580-242b-4e77-affe-0c89af4c5dbf@e20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> References: <4cd34172-9a48-4679-b4c6-ebf3793e3328@p22g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <1c84d9d4-2d55-4a73-8fb5-fb060e0f55c1@l17g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> <93a65872-09bc-43e0-8e89-802608943810@s17g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <27c59fd2-dfc0-4033-bdc2-da2d4a28c336@w4g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.1.97.109 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1284679715 17770 127.0.0.1 (16 Sep 2010 23:28:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.1.97.109; posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100701 SeaMonkey/2.0.6,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14131 Date: 2010-09-16T16:28:35-07:00 List-Id: On Sep 16, 2:23=A0pm, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > On 16 Wrz, 14:35, Colin Paul Gloster > wrote: > > > |I wonder if we'll have to wait another year for a fix?" =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 | > > |----------------------------------------------------------------------= | > > > Why not build GNAT and G++ yourself? > > Because it might take even longer, especially without the necessary > experience. > > Consider this: some time ago there was a discussion here about selling > Ada to the C shop. Take into account that in practice "the C shop" > will be "the C++ shop". But perhaps less likely an OS X shop. There must be some economical tradeoffs for AdaCore in respect of dedicating resources for building such or such marginal element of their free packages. ___________________________________________________________________________= ___ Gautier's Ada programming -- http://gautiersblog.blogspot.com/search/label/= Ada NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the following web site: http://www.fechtenafz.ethz.ch/wm_email.htm