From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on ip-172-31-91-241.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: In precision typing we trust Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 07:25:23 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <109okp3$rh6s$2@dont-email.me> References: <107uv9g$3019a$1@dont-email.me> <10855lq$gj8l$1@dont-email.me> <1088h1a$19635$1@dont-email.me> <1089p1i$1ig1d$1@dont-email.me> <108aq2p$1qo9o$1@dont-email.me> <108b1r3$1sj3c$1@dont-email.me> <108dh4t$2f5h3$2@dont-email.me> <108dkik$2g20p$1@dont-email.me> <108g1cg$32gqg$2@dont-email.me> <108h6b0$3a75k$2@dont-email.me> <108iiq5$3lihe$3@dont-email.me> <108mhhk$j2jt$1@dont-email.me> <108mis1$j4cj$1@dont-email.me> <108o33p$vok4$5@dont-email.me> <108o6rp$10njb$1@dont-email.me> <108o7cm$10qct$1@dont-email.me> <108o845$10pj9$3@dont-email.me> <108oann$115to$1@dont-email.me> <108occm$11h9j$2@dont-email.me> <108p6qm$184gc$1@dont-email.me> <108r839$1osg9$2@dont-email.me> <108rrqb$1t75f$1@dont-email.me> <108rs57$1t9nv$1@dont-email.me> <108u59r$2eq9a$1@dont-email.me> <10905r6$2umau$1@dont-email.me> <1090tlv$3370l$1@dont-email.me> <10912eh$34bqp$1@dont-email.me> <109ofrp$q3aj$1@dont-email.me> <109ohpv$qrn3$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 07:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7005646f5600b161ad3428a9c86fb0e9"; logging-data="902364"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+O54J7rrz0VbZUzwvtXqfR" User-Agent: Pan/0.163 (Kryvyi Rih) Cancel-Lock: sha1:54o+h+7aC/lj2OkD7Ozf/aqcB6A= Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:67031 List-Id: On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 06:34:39 -0000 (UTC), Kevin Chadwick wrote: > What is the aim here. To improve Oython support? Changing the discussion now? From trying to claim “Oython” couldn’t do something, when confronted with the facts, you now want to bring up something irrelevant?