From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on ip-172-31-91-241.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=none autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: In precision typing we trust Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 22:27:20 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <108vts7$2sngv$3@dont-email.me> References: <107uv9g$3019a$1@dont-email.me> <107v1ji$303of$1@dont-email.me> <336fbb5f-a279-ea8e-67fd-f62bb00d6a89@irrt.De> <107vfb9$34cpj$1@dont-email.me> <10855lq$gj8l$1@dont-email.me> <1088h1a$19635$1@dont-email.me> <1089p1i$1ig1d$1@dont-email.me> <108aq2p$1qo9o$1@dont-email.me> <108b1r3$1sj3c$1@dont-email.me> <108dh4t$2f5h3$2@dont-email.me> <108dkik$2g20p$1@dont-email.me> <108g1cg$32gqg$2@dont-email.me> <108h6b0$3a75k$2@dont-email.me> <108iiq5$3lihe$3@dont-email.me> <108mhhk$j2jt$1@dont-email.me> <108mis1$j4cj$1@dont-email.me> <108o33p$vok4$5@dont-email.me> <108o6rp$10njb$1@dont-email.me> <108o7cm$10qct$1@dont-email.me> <108o845$10pj9$3@dont-email.me> <108oann$115to$1@dont-email.me> <108occm$11h9j$2@dont-email.me> <108p3om$16qn1$3@dont-email.me> <108r884$1osg9$3@dont-email.me> <108rn4h$1rkon$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 22:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c0b3afac58395fcfe10cd8a8a01c5d34"; logging-data="3038751"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/VdtUY/Tk8y5hOYfrm4kED" User-Agent: Pan/0.163 (Kryvyi Rih) Cancel-Lock: sha1:szCCXxnYK185jAWO8lguS7IkujM= Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:67002 List-Id: On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 10:07:45 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2025-08-29 05:53, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > >> But they are still of that same “Abstract_Packet'Class”, which is >> the base class. > > Yes, because it was designed so. This is what being typed is. That is what “being statically typed” is. >> You cannot specify “Foo_Packet'Class” as the return type on one >> call, “Bar_Packet'Class” on another call, etc. > > Why should I? Because that’s what dynamic typing means. Remember, if a language is not typed (e.g. BLISS, BCPL), then you don’t specify any types at all.