From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on
	ip-172-31-91-241.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=none autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?= <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: In precision typing we trust
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 23:12:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <108o3dp$vok4$7@dont-email.me>
References: <107uv9g$3019a$1@dont-email.me> <107v1ji$303of$1@dont-email.me>
	<336fbb5f-a279-ea8e-67fd-f62bb00d6a89@irrt.De>
	<107vfb9$34cpj$1@dont-email.me> <mgmhbtF8u6bU1@mid.individual.net>
	<10855lq$gj8l$1@dont-email.me> <1088h1a$19635$1@dont-email.me>
	<1089p1i$1ig1d$1@dont-email.me> <108aq2p$1qo9o$1@dont-email.me>
	<b7a32260-7c15-7b63-6d39-0e5e809c7201@insomnia247.nl>
	<108dh2l$2f5h3$1@dont-email.me> <108ej11$2mbr8$1@dont-email.me>
	<108g1fv$32gqg$3@dont-email.me> <108h6b7$3a75k$3@dont-email.me>
	<108ijfj$3lihe$4@dont-email.me> <108jqcg$3ti12$2@dont-email.me>
	<87cy8im3kc.fsf@nightsong.com> <108l2bt$81g3$1@dont-email.me>
	<108lidc$br9n$2@dont-email.me> <108mdp7$gv59$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="db536ba589993a61865b5d43f96eac37";
	logging-data="1041028"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dZXkyBIpL/ZnehdV5xGho"
User-Agent: Pan/0.163 (Kryvyi Rih)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/2Q2ge22R0iKOS4yFd+ZmNqLoF8=
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66946
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 09:57:28 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> On 2025-08-27 02:10, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> 
>> No, it was successfully entered,
> 
> And that is all one need to know.
>>
> Remember, “call” means both “transfer” to and “return from”
> (otherwise it becomes “goto”, not “call”). That was not a
> “successful call”.

>> not successfully left.
> 
> Of course it left successfully. The interpreted did not crashed!

Python does not allow resume semantics for exceptions. Otherwise the 
function would have continued executing, which it did not.

> Hint: You cannot define the type semantics of a function in an untyped
> language. That is just what untyped means.

Not sure why that’s relevant, since Python is very much typed, and quite 
strongly typed too.