From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on
	ip-172-31-91-241.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: In precision typing we trust
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 21:36:29 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <108l2bt$81g3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <107uv9g$3019a$1@dont-email.me> <107v1ji$303of$1@dont-email.me>
 <336fbb5f-a279-ea8e-67fd-f62bb00d6a89@irrt.De>
 <107vfb9$34cpj$1@dont-email.me> <mgmhbtF8u6bU1@mid.individual.net>
 <10855lq$gj8l$1@dont-email.me> <1088h1a$19635$1@dont-email.me>
 <1089p1i$1ig1d$1@dont-email.me> <108aq2p$1qo9o$1@dont-email.me>
 <b7a32260-7c15-7b63-6d39-0e5e809c7201@insomnia247.nl>
 <108dh2l$2f5h3$1@dont-email.me> <108ej11$2mbr8$1@dont-email.me>
 <108g1fv$32gqg$3@dont-email.me> <108h6b7$3a75k$3@dont-email.me>
 <108ijfj$3lihe$4@dont-email.me> <108jqcg$3ti12$2@dont-email.me>
 <87cy8im3kc.fsf@nightsong.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 19:36:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a566786fa3882b9931648d94db222c97";
	logging-data="263683"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jG0BZCA3I8t8SB0ob1LsjhuXEfEjWwMg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/Et9KjsG9nbvZnWhfp7Vgrxthuw=
In-Reply-To: <87cy8im3kc.fsf@nightsong.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66930
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2025-08-26 18:48, Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:
>> Yep, as you can pass everything to anything:
>>
>> def F(X):
>>     X = X + 1
>> F(F)
> 
>> Very, very strong typing!
> 
> ==>  TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'function' and 'int'
> 
> The typechecking is done at runtime, just like it says on the tin.

The error occurred inside the body of F. F itself was successfully 
called, because it is untyped. Just as I said.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de