From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d303864ae4c70ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-09 15:46:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-xit-01!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Reprise: 'in out' parameters for functions Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 17:46:12 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <107e9u42850qu95@corp.supernews.com> References: <87brm1pksa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6928 Date: 2004-04-09T17:46:12-05:00 List-Id: "Florian Weimer" wrote in message news:87brm1pksa.fsf@deneb.enyo.de... > Stephen Leake writes: > > > Ada has a wart. Let's admit it, and move on. > > Can't we fix that one without breaking backwards compatibility? Or > are politics involved? Sure. But there is no will. So it won't be fixed. (See AI-323, voted "No Action"). Randy.