From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,436e4ce138981b82
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-12 10:34:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:34:03 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: abstract sub programs overriding
References: <1078849973.701176@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <b8kt40d3jti7o3r287m4gae4r6hrt1nvus@4ax.com>
 <1078924150.268074@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <at8050lmd96obnra145knv84niav1ebfrs@4ax.com>
 <1079014276.527406@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <67u0505uu3gfmlt8p28e9jkaco0nljquut@4ax.com>
 <1079019616.621636@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <qc3150ls7h74bk9hdvbaos589iiu5pm321@4ax.com>
 <1079026002.840030@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <n9t2501elclt1j9hfevqu3n8ciqf926bio@4ax.com>
 <1079097006.572713@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <h5g3509jghegrfkpt06n5q56ctsjmoolr4@4ax.com>
 <1079103394.507060@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <c2sugv$1vp41f$1@ID-77047.news.uni-berlin.de>
In-Reply-To: <c2sugv$1vp41f$1@ID-77047.news.uni-berlin.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1079116458.119831@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@aphelion.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1079116458  22516 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6280
Date: 2004-03-12T13:34:03-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> No it is how Ada does it. Here is an example:

WHere does your example involve constructing a T vs. constructing a T'Class?

> Initializing of an object of B will print:
> Init field of B
> Init A
> showing that Initialize for A is called *after* initialization of Field of
> B. It means that A's Initialize may safely use any field of B.

But it also means that initializing a field of B cannot safely use A!