From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac02560f0af03a21 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-26 09:03:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!zeus.visi.com!priapus.visi.com!orange.octanews.net!news.octanews.net!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!uninett.no!news.eunet.no!newsfeed2.fi.sn.net!fi.sn.net!newsfeed1.fi.sn.net!nntp.inet.fi!inet.fi!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:03:19 -0500 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style? References: <3FEC43B2.5080606@noplace.com> <1072450300.440355@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3FEC4E89.2070804@noplace.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: KBC Financial Products Message-ID: <1072458199.346049@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@aphelion.nyc.kbcfp.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10 X-Trace: 1072458199 11548 204.253.250.10 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3817 Date: 2003-12-26T12:03:19-05:00 List-Id: Luke A. Guest wrote: > It's not a misunderstanding, it's part of the C standard spec What is "the C standard spec"? It's definitely not the C standard, which is much too high-level to talk about parameter passing mechanisms. But it may be part of many platform ABIs.