From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,56131a5c3acc678e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-03 14:34:23 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!newshosting.com!news-xfer1.atl.newshosting.com!167.206.3.103.MISMATCH!news3.optonline.net!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 17:34:22 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question about OO programming in Ada
References: <bq092s$9ph$1@online.de> <uhe0sqfud.fsf@nasa.gov>
 <bq0qfs$3ja$1@online.de> <GpednY19wYJAdFmiRVn-gg@comcast.com>
 <bq3mef$49e$1@online.de>
 <8urxb.19482$sb4.18182@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <ygAxb.8265$lF6.7551@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <1792884.HtYz4Yv8lY@linux1.krischik.com>
 <bhjosvgrsg4mokscld2057arufu8pv1ndn@4ax.com> <uhe0idzbm.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <mghrsvguffpi8v7m6vamr8k4j38j8ufvkp@4ax.com> <m3y8tut6b3.fsf@insalien.org>
 <b0prsv8mp1a2qtadss47j7fpgg6nqumj8u@4ax.com>
 <1070466281.168920@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <ud6b5eexz.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <ud6b5eexz.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1070490862.478119@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1070490862  24348 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3122
Date: 2003-12-03T17:34:22-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Pascal Obry wrote:
> Certainly not! Unchecked_Deallocation will set the pointer to null and
> Unchecked_Deallocation on a null pointer does nothing.

Not on a pointer field within the object, but on the object itself.