From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,20dd8ed49a092517 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.27.14 with SMTP id g14mr7420141qac.1.1347886527263; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.109.233 with SMTP id s69mr1676413yhg.11.1347886527232; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Path: t12ni8qak.0!nntp.google.com!v8no6535077qap.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 05:55:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <99575344-c301-4af2-9155-b6577bfb1ca6@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.51.153.177; posting-account=cUi90woAAADTaOISowbbHM8GUD0-opJO NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.51.153.177 References: <99575344-c301-4af2-9155-b6577bfb1ca6@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <106b2629-3428-4290-8c73-8f6b91b123a1@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective) From: Patrick Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:55:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-09-17T05:55:27-07:00 List-Id: I hope I don't upset anyone with this... I am new to Ada and don't really know anything.... but I would recommend coding in the native API and then linking in your Ada= code. Both of these toolkits are huge and mind crushingly complex. If anything go= es wrong, documentation and internet posts are pretty much the only way to = solve the issue. I don't think there are enough posts for either of the bi= ndings for these toolkits and not enough documentation and examples to lear= n them well.=20 If something goes wrong there are mailing list but I suspect you would have= to wait for answers rather then looking up posts from peoples previous pro= blems.=20 -Patrick