From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ames!lll-tis!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "C" vrs ADA Message-ID: <1069@bsu-cs.UUCP> Date: Sat, 29-Aug-87 21:05:28 EDT Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.1069 Posted: Sat Aug 29 21:05:28 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 4-Sep-87 00:38:02 EDT References: <1065@vu-vlsi.UUCP> <12513@clyde.ATT.COM> <203@trwrc.UUCP> <138@kesmai.COM> <584@sugar.UUCP> Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi) Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana Summary: VMS C has advantages Xref: mnetor comp.lang.ada:621 comp.lang.c:4081 List-Id: In article <584@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: >[VAX/VMS C] is the worst 'C' development environment >it has ever been my misfortune to work under, both because of the poor >support for VMS in VAX C, and because of the incredibly poor performance >of the resulting programs. I think the $39.95 MIX C compiler for MS-DOS is somewhat worse. Even a very careful reading of the VMS C documentation and release notes reveals absolutely no bugs or deficiencies in the VMS C environment. If anything, as the manual makes clear, VMS C adds functionality to the original UNIX implementation. Compare this with the large number of bugs and deficiencies that are documented in the manual for almost every UNIX program. Also note that VMS C runtime environment automatically converts all command-line arguments to lowercase, thus greatly simplifying argument parsing. And no lint-like program is provided, saving you the temptation of using one and having to face the rude diagnostics it would probably give you. But perhaps the most outstanding advantage of VMS C environment is that the cursor control routines require a terminal manufactured by DEC or something equivalent. This saves no end of trouble--no more time wasted having to create termcap entries for strange terminals of questionable quality. -- Rahul Dhesi UUCP: {ihnp4,seismo}!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi