From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,54889de51045a215
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-21 08:05:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:02:23 -0400
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: += in ada
References: <DL1lb.8187$Fc5.7691@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <mailman.147.1066742721.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.147.1066742721.25614.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1066748543.350143@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@aphelion.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1066748543  6790 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1297
Date: 2003-10-21T11:02:23-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Alexandre E. Kopilovitch wrote:
> Particular language, Ada in the case, is completely irrelevant here.

Robert Eachus said
     "No.  Efficiency on the level you are talking about, in Ada,
     is something we delegate to the compiler."

I was merely pointing to a very prominent example demonstrating
that his statement is not (universally) correct.