From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 X-Google-Thread: 103376,64599bfe530783cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-16 06:32:58 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:32:32 -0400 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Any examples of Byte Ordering Functions References: <1066243458.911546@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: KBC Financial Products Message-ID: <1066311152.558807@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10 X-Trace: 1066311152 22133 204.253.250.10 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:977 Date: 2003-10-16T09:32:32-04:00 List-Id: James Rogers wrote: > S�Bit_Order Won't setting the BIT_ORDER to the opposite of your machine's default also reverse the bits of an octet? That doesn't sound like what the OP wants, and it's not what the [hn][ls]to[nh] functions do.