From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6f7b92fd11ab291 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-22 12:16:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!priapus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!ash.uu.net!spool.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 15:16:13 -0400 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030611 Thunderbird/0.1a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Crosspost: Help wanted from comp.compilers References: <3F158832.1040206@attbi.com> <1058378673.35463@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1058390613.119827@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <2OERa.4718$0F4.3216@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <1058539398.178565@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F18D647.9020505@attbi.com> <3F1B207B.6090308@attbi.com> <1058800464.63505@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F1C48F6.8010700@attbi.com> <3b1Ta.14846$0F4.12183@nwrdny02.gnilink.net> <3F1CC567.5000407@attbi.com> In-Reply-To: <3F1CC567.5000407@attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: KBC Financial Products Message-ID: <1058901373.624808@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10 X-Trace: 1058901373 5215 204.253.250.10 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40666 Date: 2003-07-22T15:16:13-04:00 List-Id: Robert I. Eachus wrote: > But there is no way to get around the ordering requirements, > and there should not be. I'm not trying to get around the ordering requirements in terms of making sure that a linked program is correct and consistent. I'm trying to get around the implication that once everything is compiled, the simple act of recompiling a unit, when neither its source nor its compilation flags have changed, forces all dependent units to be recompiled, as a requirement of the Ada programming language. I still do not believe that this is the case.