From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Luke A. Guest Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Status of SDLAda Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:58:52 +0100 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <1055974136.495751729.643285.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> References: <579554615.495335357.185457.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <1736075160.495335426.356316.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <1836987127.495410150.367894.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: DehzhlnkoDZ6ngbSSiAHDg.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: NewsTap/5.1.8 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2a0cZ6Odpg4QS0qgr9XuQ9trQdk= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31795 Date: 2016-09-16T21:58:52+01:00 List-Id: Michael B. wrote: > On 09/13/16 00:01, Luke A. Guest wrote: >> interface, thin where need be thick when required, stick to the Ada style > > Fine :-) Cool. > I have written an Ada package (two files) for RWOps. What should I do > with them? Do you prefer a fork/pull-request on Github, an email or > something else? Git format-patch, can you declare in the commit that you are assigning it to me? You can email it through git or GitHub. This will make binding sdl image lib easier as well. I would like to have an Ada stream interface but I don't think that will be possible. >> and agrees to copyright assignment which can be done in a hit pull /patch. > > I've never thought about this legal stuff, but I'm ok with that. Just > tell me what I need to do. Yeah I've been thinking more about this recently as I want to keep this binding matching the libsdl license and if they change it, it'll be s pain. I doubt they will as libsdl2 used to be pure GPL. You see, AdaCore generated a thin binding and then slapped a GPL license, no exception, which was stupid and really insulting. I want to make sure this stays as free as possible and be the best binding there is. Luke