From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 10:58:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsengine.sol.net!zeus.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!spool0902.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:57:51 -0400 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030529 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: KBC Financial Products Message-ID: <1054749471.638483@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10 X-Trace: 1054749472 13754 204.253.250.10 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38630 Date: 2003-06-04T13:57:51-04:00 List-Id: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote: > Some of the funny code obfuscation examples > use case sensitivity. Deliberately bad code is hardly a justification. But since we've been arguing about readability and English usage and so on, what is the reason for allowing digits in identifiers? After all, until 133t-speak emerged, natural language did not use digits in words, and that would prevent confusion between 0 and O and 1 and l.