From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.211.136 with SMTP id nc8mr11065248pbc.6.1335718757472;
        Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni112679pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: okellogg@users.sourceforge.net
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 09:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <10544679.2854.1335718755733.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbdx11>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <4f97bf40$0$6559$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <jn9f2o$g98$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <op.wdb9nm14ule2fv@douda-yannick> <jn9pjs$b8a$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <op.wdcbcfmcule2fv@douda-yannick> <jn9u73$mao$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <op.wdckmcyzule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <7039631.627.1335610937700.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbxz8>
 <wccehr6hcw6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.33.196.203
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1335718757 18826 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2012 16:59:17
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 16:59:17 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <wccehr6hcw6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=91.33.196.203;
 posting-account=a23u_AkAAAB-Xz81hSqodYsmJRrMwioK
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-04-29T09:59:15-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, April 29, 2012 3:43:21 PM UTC+2, Robert A Duff wrote:
> 
> Ideally, nested packages and child packages would have
> identical semantics.  Switching from one to the other
> would not change anything.  That's almost, but not quite,
> true, and your suggestion above is one example where
> it's not true.

Could you elaborate?

Thanks.

-- Oliver