From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1592759aa83d0d45 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-27 12:13:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!bigboote.WPI.EDU!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!spool0900.news.uu.net!reader0901.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:53 -0400 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030506 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Suggestion for Ada 200x - Interface inheritance References: <0Pxza.699607$OV.652508@rwcrnsc54> <5ad0dd8a.0305240435.337d9373@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0305250612.ec54c23@posting.google.com> <3ED1039F.7010001@spam.com> <719Aa.14547$fT5.3595@nwrdny01.gnilink.net> <5ad0dd8a.0305252353.44adf560@posting.google.com> <5ad0dd8a.0305271041.25ca7120@posting.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5ad0dd8a.0305271041.25ca7120@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: KBC Financial Products Message-ID: <1054062833.558791@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10 X-Trace: 1054062833 reader1.ash.ops.us.uu.net 2721 204.253.250.10 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37855 Date: 2003-05-27T15:13:53-04:00 List-Id: Wojtek Narczynski wrote: > But the situation where you cannot rely on the compiler to check > wether you did not forget to put an exception handler in isn't good > either. Yes it is.