From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab1d177a5a26577d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o8g2000vbq.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Britt Snodgrass <britt.snodgrass@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++?
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 06:48:04 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <104f2d2c-9697-4bb4-88a1-9174c6349bb2@o8g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <1ee1a434-4048-48f6-9f5e-d8126bebb808@r19g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <ijq628$iru$1@news.eternal-september.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.252.170.138
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1298213285 9823 127.0.0.1 (20 Feb 2011 14:48:05
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:48:05 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o8g2000vbq.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.252.170.138;
 posting-account=rdRzuwoAAAAyW3CSBhs_xgfCUJSc1aNt
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US)
 AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Chrome/9.0.597.98 Safari/534.13,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18458
Date: 2011-02-20T06:48:04-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 19, 10:41=A0pm, "Chuck" <chuckmacdon...@nospam.me> wrote:

> What wrong with C++? It may be better to ask what is wrong with the other
> 2! Anyway, the list of what is right with C++ is much, much shorter, so
> by process of elimination, what is not on the good list, is on the bad
> list. Here's my list of good things:
>
> =A0 Uses curly-braces, mostly effectively.
>
> I'll add to this list as I think of any more things.

No, "uses curly-braces" is an item for the bad list, unless one enjoys
using their editor's match-brace function and scrolling up/down a lot.

- Britt