From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3b67c7e4c7509ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-20 08:07:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!bigboote.WPI.EDU!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!spool0902.news.uu.net!not-for-mail Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 11:07:23 -0500 From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030313 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: MFC References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: KBC Financial Products Message-ID: <1048176444.65357@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10 X-Trace: 1048176444 27793 204.253.250.10 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35571 Date: 2003-03-20T11:07:23-05:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > The only problem we faced, before abadoning any use of MFC in our C++ > projects, was that it leaked in many places on many occasions. Is that > horrible enough? (:-)) We've written largish C++ applications with MFC and they don't leak. Did you acquire any evidence that the leak was due to internal MFC behavior rather than your own failure to manage resources correctly?