From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25d5234e7b6ca361
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-27 07:32:45 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!spool0901.news.uu.net!spool0900.news.uu.net!reader0901.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:32:28 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030130
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc
Subject: Re: Ada versus language-X and "getting real work done" (was): 64
 bit addressing and OOP
References: <mvul4v00ftbai2g6duuh0r38jpii2qvpjl@4ax.com>
 <a3eaa964.0302132057.7568b83d@posting.google.com>
 <slrnb4qo0n.q3u.mbkennelSPAMBEGONE@lyapunov.ucsd.edu>
 <a3eaa964.0302141953.16f72dfe@posting.google.com>
 <3E4E8F8C.9C096985@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302250710.5549baaf@posting.google.com>
 <3E5C7033.BD5DC462@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302260618.7506cba7@posting.google.com>
 <3E5CF5C6.84822F57@adaworks.com>
 <a3eaa964.0302261422.4d166fa1@posting.google.com>
 <1046299823.547481@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <a3eaa964.0302262309.30b45f08@posting.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <a3eaa964.0302262309.30b45f08@posting.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1046359947.994401@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1046359964 reader1.ash.ops.us.uu.net 2787 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:59402 comp.object:58499
 comp.lang.ada:34674 misc.misc:12183
Date: 2003-02-27T10:32:28-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
> Interesting that your experience should be so in contrast
> to the ten years of research and effort DoD put into studying
> that very issue in their own shops using their own code
> and repeated system interoperation experiences to the
> contrary, in the work leading up to the first Ada language
> standard.

Do you have any references to support this claim?
Eg., <http://archive.adaic.com/pol-hist/policy/3405-1.txt>
talks about ease of management and improvement of process
through use of Ada, but there is no mention of interproject
communications.