From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-30 10:01:51 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.abs.net!uunet!dca.uu.net!ash.uu.net!spool0902.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:01:17 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030116
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One silly idea..
References: <1043339266.922562@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <b0ttr4$s9ilj$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
 <7iLY9.2401$qb1.464@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
 <jd0a3v8civ48r8b21vvo4cd56i1pfe9prs@4ax.com>
 <1043680098.61106@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <3afc3v4uur2kvd53v4ul18b5npjfm188o3@4ax.com>
 <1043773909.385612@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <q64f3v4211gtjrcnrek80ctlbi9ilbkvm7@4ax.com>
 <1043855067.848326@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <m6uf3vkuvohdv99t5vqvcg4hgev1ub6neb@4ax.com>
 <1043938878.313737@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <rski3vor157ha7intcpu0f4cp40eclqima@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <rski3vor157ha7intcpu0f4cp40eclqima@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1043949677.919365@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1043949677  4881 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33607
Date: 2003-01-30T13:01:17-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> But you don't. It is already here.

But someone does.

> You just reuse it, because int is to some extent a subtype of double.

No, because int is convertible to double.

Besides you, I haven't heard anyone else
who would consider that to be subtyping.
Indeed, any time I encounter such type
lattices they always seem enshrouded in
confusion.