From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-28 09:17:20 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newspeer.monmouth.com!zeus.visi.com!phobos.visi.com!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!uunet!ash.uu.net!spool0900.news.uu.net!reader0900.news.uu.net!not-for-mail
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 12:16:55 -0500
From: Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030116
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One silly idea..
References: <mailman.1041817083.31051.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <avc2tk$e3qv9$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
 <1041908422.928308@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <kegl1vsa5tjnkuo04ckgt78b3lsn5j0ium@4ax.com>
 <1041997309.165001@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <avh8fs$fni6s$2@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
 <1042086217.253468@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <avmj4i$gh335$2@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de>
 <1042477504.547640@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <b044a1$l4p22$1@ID-77047.news.dfncis.de> <3E32B5C0.5090004@attbi.com>
 <1043684990.403565@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <wcc7kcpflvb.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <wcc7kcpflvb.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: KBC Financial Products
Message-ID: <1043774214.741991@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Cache-Post-Path: master.nyc.kbcfp.com!unknown@nightcrawler.nyc.kbcfp.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 3.0.1 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 204.253.250.10
X-Trace: 1043774215 reader0.ash.ops.us.uu.net 11396 204.253.250.10
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33502
Date: 2003-01-28T12:16:55-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert A Duff wrote:
> No, because you can't pass a nested procedure to a less-nested
> procedure.

So you can instantiate a generic procedure and pass its address
to a less-nested procedure, even though the generic uses procedures
defined at a more-nested level?