From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c350c9f790688d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-11 14:10:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: renames and access
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:09:52 -0600
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <102la2t6t41vm7b@corp.supernews.com>
References: <pan.2004.02.11.19.14.49.293492@virgilio.it>
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5459
Date: 2004-02-11T16:09:52-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Francesco Bochicchio" <bockman@virgilio.it> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.02.11.19.14.49.293492@virgilio.it...

> Is this normal ??(I work with ObjectADA, did not try yet with GNAT)

Yes. When you call "Reallocate_Memory", you're getting a new object, and
assigning an access to that into Rec_Ptr. But a renames provides a new name
for an object, in this case the original object that you renamed.

> Is there any way to have the renames to automatically points to the new
> memory?

I can't think of one. You could rename the access object, but that hardly
helps.

> If this turns impossible, what would be an equivalent solution? At the
> moment, my bet is to turn the renames into access. Any better idea?

I don't have one, but perhaps someone else will.

             Randy.