From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Kevin Chadwick Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Software on SpaceX / Blue Origin projects Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:49:56 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <102cc3k$239l0$1@dont-email.me> References: <87mvp3ol3t.fsf@nightsong.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 18:49:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="773b8549f07e04510c9efafaff6c0dbf"; logging-data="2205344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8Nf8z6UmdeiSpG77ezOvPBF+aZ1hiwzU=" User-Agent: PhoNews/3.13.3 (Android/14) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hsVQhwQ05NWF2XVJcxbSAZRhEMk= In-Reply-To: Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:66559 List-Id: > >(I'm very happy that SpaceX succeeded here. Not only do they deserve it, after >such persistence, but I think it is a very important step that will force all >launcher suppliers to aim towards reusable launchers, leading to huge >launch-cost reductions.)" > I wouldn't trust anything that Elon is involved with. I believe SpaceX won atleast one contract against Blue Origin during an interim senators term who met with him when their application was awarded outstanding despite not meeting the level to qualify at all. The NASA director said he would hold SpaceX to deliver before releasing any further funds during Bidens term but he has been removed. Has any re-usability beyond what the space shuttle achieved actually been demonstrated?