From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: fa0ae,f7a7163813ae8672 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa0ae,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-23 18:19:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!howland.erols.net!news-out.worldnet.att.net.MISMATCH!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.204!attbi_feed4!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Mark Henri" Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.perl.misc References: <1004990076967295@aol.com> <3be6fcf8$1@news.sentex.net> <9vdb7r$5jf$01$1@news.t-online.com> <1o9V7.97944$li3.1014592@ozemail.com.au> Subject: Re: Best language for low IQ programmers? X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Message-ID: <0hwV7.2972$vr4.12886@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.230.37.1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net 1009160380 12.230.37.1 (Mon, 24 Dec 2001 02:19:40 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 02:19:40 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 02:19:40 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.c++:113687 comp.lang.java.programmer:119387 comp.lang.ada:18269 comp.lang.perl.misc:83824 Date: 2001-12-24T02:19:40+00:00 List-Id: Visual Basic-- extremely powerful yet anyone can get an app up and running. Plus you get to use loads of ActiveX controls that do everything for you. PowerBuilder is another good one. Visual FoxPro? Lyndon wrote in message <1o9V7.97944$li3.1014592@ozemail.com.au>... >"Christian Menke" wrote in >news:9vdb7r$5jf$01$1@news.t-online.com: > >>> > I say, wait till someone writes a cross platform compiler for >>> > English. Then you'll have a chance. >>> >>> I'm not so sure. Did you notice his use of English? >>> Hardly a sentence without a spelling error! >>> There's unlikely ever to be a compiler capable of coping with that. >> >> If a human brain can cope with it, it must be possible to write a >> compiler capable of doing it too. >> >> >> > >So you are saying the human brain is Turing machine complete :-) What if >the brain's processing abilities are greater than a Turing machine? > >