From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,25d835bb9a4a003f
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Types, packages & objects : the good old naming conventions
	question (without religious ware)
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <0ef44c2d-3848-4780-8663-f5f96efc7638@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <561e0a4a-c6c0-42db-9f31-a70f4eae1ed9@a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<hce79b$daf$1@aioe.org> <ygeocnohy02.fsf@hugsarin.sparre-andersen.dk>
	<u4ope4pqa.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <Xns9CB636112C917pcc482719gmailcom@198.186.192.137>
	<u1vkdrert.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <y-Odnak8_-myrm7XnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<uskcsne3h.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <QaWdnfOsAYiw72nXnZ2dnUVZ_hmdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<u639mop0u.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <c4Cdnet0zaMxw2XXnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<uaayu24yf.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <-9ydneBa_O8wB2TXnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.146
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1262129224 8524 127.0.0.1 (29 Dec 2009 23:27:04
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:27:04 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.146;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8549
Date: 2009-12-29T15:27:04-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Do not remember if it was already previously suggested in this
discussion : it appears to me a naming convention for tagged types is
helpful to better understand an implementation. I already use _Class
and _Class_Access (although I would enjoy a shorter one for this one)
postfix for class-wide types and class-wide access, now I feel the
_Type postfix is not enough. Types and tagged types should be
distinguishable at first sight as well.

By the way, I was thinking this may be an idea to think about in
future days, to add to the now widely used syntax colorization, a step
forward : semantic colorization (may be with font variants).