From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1b41412c7bc28c47
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: amado.alves@gmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Suffix _T for types found good
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <0ebdf2bf-5ce6-4618-8a78-4a9ebc3f7df7@79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>
References: <2e9ebb23-a68b-43cf-8871-febcb173f951@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>
	<4899d2af$0$19731$4d3efbfe@news.sover.net>
 <sbidndoc_aQH0wfVnZ2dnUVZ_tjinZ2d@comcast.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.0808071536330.4692@teor1> <uwsispxj0.fsf@STRIPCAPStelus.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.214.84.23
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1218129556 21554 127.0.0.1 (7 Aug 2008 17:19:16
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 17:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 79g2000hsk.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.214.84.23;
	posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1;
	.NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR
	1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1516
Date: 2008-08-07T10:19:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> > =A0index : anIndex;
> > =A0buffer : aBuffer;
>
> This is backwards to me:
>
> =A0 anIndex : Index;
> =A0 aBuffer : Buffer;
>
> E.g. the value is a specific instance vs the type is general. The names s=
hould
> reflect that.

Finally, someone said it!

Ray, on the issue of small routines, yes, *perfect* code is only
compound of small routines ;-)