From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m16g2000prc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 10:10:14 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <0d88954d-091e-442b-b3bb-3b329c9fc4ea@m16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <737a6396-72bd-4a1e-8895-7d50f287960e@d28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5008a5$0$6879$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <eda00084-fcc3-416c-bd3e-8b9e9c1a4b40@o13g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5031fe$0$6765$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1f229967-d3cf-42b6-8087-c97ee08652f3@i40g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d51169e$0$7657$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <db60098c-2569-4efb-aa81-253ba53686b4@y26g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
 <iis37l$t09$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
 <4d51905c$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <36212a7b-deab-45d9-ac45-aa29cd90c7bc@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d51a7bb$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <iisll6$9th$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <4d52b489$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <9a8njlwvey1p.1a96yvvgdf6yu.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.151.164
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297275014 22429 127.0.0.1 (9 Feb 2011 18:10:14
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 18:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m16g2000prc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.151.164;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17106
Date: 2011-02-09T10:10:14-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 9, 9:15=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
>
> Even if the damage inflicted by a program is less than one by a
> malfunctioned hardware there is a psychological difference. People do not
> accept preventable or deliberate damages. E.g. it is OK for thousands to
> die in car accidents, but intolerable when a single person die in gun
> shooting.

I agree with the point you're making, but certainly NOT the example.
In Jurisprudence even homicide may be justified; it is why soldiers
that have killed in war-zones are not, by the fact of their killing
another,
automatically murderers. It is the reason that someone being mugged
is not a murderer if they kill to protect themselves: regardless of
whether or not the implement used is a gun, or knife, or even fists.