From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.140.151.65 with SMTP id 62mr49887389qhx.1.1435949355116; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:49:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.81.149 with SMTP id f21mr496419qgd.8.1435949355100; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!t90no857222qga.0!news-out.google.com!4ni38828qgh.1!nntp.google.com!s91no856995qgd.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 11:49:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.99.95.58; posting-account=sDyr7QoAAAA7hiaifqt-gaKY2K7OZ8RQ NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.99.95.58 References: <9894cde7-2cf8-4060-be65-857812ad7b09@googlegroups.com> <17436268-aceb-461f-bdcf-eee8436cd0e6@googlegroups.com> <86y4jaqzdx.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86oak5qulb.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86k2usq66p.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <864mllqv7c.fsf@stephe-leake.org> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <0d266aaa-25f6-49a3-ae0d-e55150182efe@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: What do you think about this? From: Laurent Injection-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:49:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2316 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1183336610 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26587 Date: 2015-07-03T11:49:14-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, 3 July 2015 19:46:29 UTC+2, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > On 07/03/2015 10:11 AM, Laurent wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2015 14:31:05 UTC+2, Stephen Leake wrote: > >> Using a bounded string always involves a hidden length limit; if it's > >> too small, you'll hit it sometime, if it's too big, you're wasting storage. > No, he means he doesn't like bounded strings. No offense meant but that falls in the category "Sh*t happens". You can't do it right for everyone and if you do nothing it is also wrong. > If you're not happy, use Ada.Strings.Unbounded.Unbounded_String. Aren't Unbounded_Strings wasting memory too?