From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,20dd8ed49a092517
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.216.202.93 with SMTP id c71mr427298weo.3.1347961773842;
        Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.75.36 with SMTP id z4mr1210049vdv.14.1347961773678; Tue, 18
 Sep 2012 02:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ed8ni114471314wib.0!nntp.google.com!v8no34853qap.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 02:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <44ed5dd4-451e-43eb-be80-5c554e5c86d6@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.230.82.82;
 posting-account=vICoKAoAAACvprQdoU1Fu4jhuX0G_mBQ
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2.230.82.82
References: <99575344-c301-4af2-9155-b6577bfb1ca6@googlegroups.com>
 <k39cet$grd$2@dont-email.me>
 <44ed5dd4-451e-43eb-be80-5c554e5c86d6@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0c19f250-7508-4eff-acc9-3e99ff7ff06a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Qt or Gtk? (from an Ada perspective)
From: alb348@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:49:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-09-18T02:49:33-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Zenity looks interesting indeed. Only, it does not seem to support text
> edit boxes (unless I am mistaken), which I really need.

I can now confirm it, after checking more thoroughly: no text edit boxes in Zenity. Too bad, because otherwise it would have been perfect for my needs.
I am afraid that for a decent text edit box, the compelled choice will be either Qt or Gtk, after all.