From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT
	GPL 2009?
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <0bd7364c-8c9a-49ee-8066-905ac968270f@k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<e1b3e4ee-cd84-4b98-8b38-225ccc607705@s1g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
	<b0a3e261-c79d-4706-b6d7-bc3d6d3b1b23@p6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<75p7uoF17umq6U1@mid.individual.net>
 <76bd0952-f85c-44f5-80ae-b0916a699a35@c18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
	<afdfb90c-7cde-44df-b0ab-84b336d9aaf8@q33g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241111031 20373 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2009 17:03:51
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218;
	posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.0.10)
	Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5636
Date: 2009-04-30T10:03:51-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 30, 6:17=A0am, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> My advice, if you want your bug fixed, is to get a support contract
> from AdaCore.

The point is that don't really feel any need to have it fixed. I'm
happy to have it remained unfixed, in which case I'll do something
else.

Like many others who have replied, it seems to me that you're applying
the principle that "we're all in this together". If that were true,
efforts to modify my behavior would be perfectly appropriate. Yet I am
not in this together with all of you. I'm not wedded to Ada. I don't
have enough invested in it.

I'm an outsider at this point, delivering a message. I care only
enough to be a messenger. If you want to shoot the messenger, fine
with me, though after which you should anticipate fewer messages.