From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a37:aa88:: with SMTP id t130mr2498477qke.12.1562321564504;
        Fri, 05 Jul 2019 03:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:18a:: with SMTP id
 q10mr2285902ota.114.1562321564212;
 Fri, 05 Jul 2019 03:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!m24no8812251qtm.0!news-out.google.com!g23ni232qtq.1!nntp.google.com!m24no8812247qtm.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 03:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7658ef61-617a-4550-b640-5bf0eb316f6d@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=185.22.143.165;
 posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.22.143.165
References: <bc15f927-4563-47d7-bf54-2ceb313b3b13@googlegroups.com>
 <b99b5a14-1103-4015-9d3c-8f5f089beeb5@googlegroups.com>
 <7658ef61-617a-4550-b640-5bf0eb316f6d@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0bb878c4-6223-459a-83fe-99b9eb157cb4@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Can I get Buffer Contents of unreleased memory when running
 gnatmem?
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2019 10:12:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:56819
Date: 2019-07-05T03:12:43-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am Freitag, 5. Juli 2019 07:48:44 UTC+2 schrieb Petter Fryklund:
> Currently some culprits are overriding Finalize without disposing the instance it self. I thought that that would be automatic, but it's not.

Finalization and storage deallocation are two different things.

Dynamic Storage Allocation:

When the lifetime of an access type ends, all still existing objects referenced via pointers of this type are finalized in an order unspecified by the language.

The associated storage, however, is only freed if the attribute Storage_Size is defined for it.