From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d65138770e3daae3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr15960813pbc.8.1340791483020;
        Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni25330pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Keean Schupke <keean.schupke@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Refactoring for error: cannot inline "X" (forward instance within
 enclosing body)
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 03:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <0b5eba49-bdbb-499a-b48f-f89fd56f237d@googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <7a18bc7e-2541-46f9-9d92-65d87fed06e6@googlegroups.com><jsaf89$9a9$1@dont-email.me><d651e7c9-e091-42a9-b56b-2502e6fab091@googlegroups.com>
 <jsc3pr$iap$1@dont-email.me> <jsdduf$har$1@munin.nbi.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.44.19.199
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1340791482 8340 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2012 10:04:42
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:04:42 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <jsdduf$har$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.44.19.199;
 posting-account=T5Z2vAoAAAB8ExE3yV3f56dVATtEMNcM
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-06-27T03:04:42-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 23:43:24 UTC+1, Randy Brukardt  wrote:
> "Brian Drummond" 
>  wrote in message 
> ...
> > Georg points out a workaround : -gnatN performs inline expansion in the
> > Gnat front end, which CAN see the package body while compiling the outer
> > module. It is not clear to me : is that allowed by the LRM, or is Gnat
> > being a little naughty here?
> 
> Inline_Always is a GNAT invention, so it can do what it wants. And it is 
> always OK for an Ada compiler to inline (whether or not a pragma or aspect 
> or command line option is given.)
> 
>                                 Randy.


Is this something that should be considered a limitation, or bug in GNAT?


Cheers,
Keean.