From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f15b862e11b575a4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: KK6GM Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Air traffic control system in Java Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:18:42 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <0b3daa32-8571-4a7f-a96f-cd876f4c4127@d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com> References: <4d6ffe16$0$17930$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com> <835e91b1-50f7-4b20-beaf-5b5afcc66cc5@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <4d701d79$0$17918$a8266bb1@postbox2.readnews.com> <4d711c62$0$27719$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d712326$0$27719$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d712b6a$0$17204$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.35.64.226 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299262722 15730 127.0.0.1 (4 Mar 2011 18:18:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: d12g2000prj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=12.35.64.226; posting-account=qZVz2QoAAAAN9WxYp-9jYb7jORc4Zqwt User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 barracudaweb.tritool.rancho:8080 (http_scan/4.0.2.6.19) X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MDDR; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; InfoPath.1),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18800 Date: 2011-03-04T10:18:42-08:00 List-Id: On Mar 4, 10:11=A0am, Hyman Rosen wrote: > On 3/4/2011 1:00 PM, KK6GM wrote: > > > You're simply moving the goalposts. =A0You said *all* computer > > programs. =A0That would by definition include programs running in > > billions of devices with 1 to 8k of program memory, and 1k or less of > > data memory. =A0Do you really want to claim that *all* 8051 and AVR and > > 8-bit PIC programs include a GUI? > > Nope. ("Billions of devices" is silly, of course, since those > are not running billions of individually written programs.) Nor did I claim otherwise. But even if they were all running just one program, your claim is falsified. > I was just being hyperbolic. I fully agree that college classes > in embedded device programming don't need to have their students > write programs with graphical user interfaces. So you agree with Dr. Dewar about the problems re Java and modern CS programs. BTW, I don't think all the 8-bit manufacturers (not to mention e.g. the Cortex M0 and M3 manufacturers) are selling only to college classrooms.