From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d4bd0014df0bfc4b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y9g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Build gcc-ada on/for Solaris x86_64? Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <0a9553f2-3bb3-4332-a611-305b03428c67@y9g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1238166413 19685 127.0.0.1 (27 Mar 2009 15:06:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y9g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197; posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5341 Date: 2009-03-27T08:06:53-07:00 List-Id: On Mar 27, 2:22=A0pm, inva...@domain.invalid wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to be able to use gcc ada on my Solaris 10 Intel box. I > did some preliminary checking and it doesn't look like a trivial > undertaking. > > I'm wondering if any of the participants in comp.lang.ada have done > this or anything similar. > > I have gcc 3.4.x running on the Solaris box from Sun's Companion CD but > it was not built with Ada support. > > I have 64 and 32 bit Linux boxes both running gcc 4.2.4 with > Ada. Maybe it's simple (!) to build a cross target from this system? > > I read somewhere that the gcc ada version isn't necessarily the same > as the gcc version. Is there a reason why I can't use 4.2.4 Ada on a > gcc 3.4 base. Is gccada at the 3.4 level worth having? > > Any comments/suggestions? I suggest you install the package gcc3ada from www.blastwave.org; this is GCC 3.4.5 with Ada enabled. If you would like a more recent version, use gcc3ada to compile GCC 4.3.3 with Ada. It would be nice if you would then contribute your packages back to blastwave. PS. I recommend against package gcc4ada (GCC 4.0.2) because of bugs resulting from the introduction of Tree-SSA in GCC 4.0 (i.e. impedance mismatches between the Ada front-end and the GCC 4.0 back-end). -- Ludovic Brenta.