From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,f1823654f37e98f9 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: MinGW GNAT and GCC specs strings Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <0a49aa40-1c70-400f-83d7-841d8093bec6@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> References: <14277761-4ef7-4588-a763-83e7c735cc23@k2g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <2c1b6d31-ba74-4db5-8063-fea91a0e3735@r31g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <704d2d25-ac11-421b-94bf-3181e8a065ce@l32g2000vba.googlegroups.com> <795fabe1-9cf7-4606-bed9-a46e1dff54d6@g1g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.250 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244131130 14952 127.0.0.1 (4 Jun 2009 15:58:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.250; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6255 Date: 2009-06-04T08:58:50-07:00 List-Id: On 4 juin, 17:20, anhvofrc...@gmail.com wrote: > Actually, only path to bin directory is need for GNAT running on > MinGW. Assuming MinGW is at C:\MinGW, the path=C:\MinGW\bin is > sufficient to run GNAT. > > Anh Vo You sees to know about the subject : do you know if the GNAT compiler which comes with GPS made some use of the registry ? If it is, perhaps the compiler I've build, which is another one, is disturbed by some configuration stored in the registry. But I've ran "configure" so that the windows registry should normally not be used. It's on stand-by at the time. Il will tell more later after some further attempts.