From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.39.211 with SMTP id n202mr12982543ion.85.1515583317133; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 03:21:57 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.44.232 with SMTP id e37mr520146otd.11.1515583317053; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 03:21:57 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!tncsrv06.tnetconsulting.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g80no47906itg.0!news-out.google.com!b73ni7599ita.0!nntp.google.com!g80no47905itg.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 03:21:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83cd:caad:e185:d245:39a2:b5f4; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83cd:caad:e185:d245:39a2:b5f4 References: <81971548-23c9-4927-a6a8-6f0f1dba896b@googlegroups.com> <5879f25e-c825-4c84-a219-293d1508b33d@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <0a36b039-2b4c-409b-8fa9-80fc0da00ee0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: stopping a loop iteration without exiting it From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 11:21:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49836 Date: 2018-01-10T03:21:56-08:00 List-Id: Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2018 12:14:41 UTC+1 schrieb Dmitry A. Kazakov: > On 10/01/2018 11:52, AdaMagica wrote: > > Fact is that any syntax that might lead to > > ambiguities is not going to fly because it's incompatible with the > > basics of Ada. > > I don't see any ambiguity as there is none in > > exit Process; > > It exits the loop at its end, it does not jump to the point before the > loop. So could do > > goto Process; This is sophistry again in pure form. Have you ever read Shakespear? "Exit Duncan" means, he leaves the stage and does not immediately enter again ;-)