From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,699cc914522aa7c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.net!prodigy.net!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Wasteful internationalization Date: 3 Feb 2007 05:52:31 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: <0NUhKPkPLsRZ@eisner.encompasserve.org> References: <1170464671.166414.311980@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1170503453 13986 192.135.80.34 (3 Feb 2007 11:50:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8872 Date: 2007-02-03T05:52:31-06:00 List-Id: In article <1170464671.166414.311980@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "Adam Beneschan" writes: > On Feb 2, 4:48 pm, Bj=F6rn Persson wrote: >> Larry Kilgallen wrote: >> > And what client on my VMS system would display those characters on my >> > VT102 (emulator) ? >> >> I don't know VMS. comp.os.vms might be a better place to ask about that. >> >> > It seems to me that people in newsgroups should stick to ASCII. >> >> So, you want the entire world to use the American Standard Code? I suppose >> we should all drop our un-American, nonstandard languages and only speak >> and write American Standard English, right? > > No way. You Scandinavians already speak better English than most of > us Americans do. So it's perfectly fine for you to go on speaking > English Standard English. :) :) :) :) > > But Larry, I think you hit a nerve when you made your comment to a > person who has an o-umlaut in his name. I can understand why he may > have gotten a bit peeved---you're practically asking him not to use > his own name on the Internet. I try not to object to characters in names, since I do not read names for content.