From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,73cb216d191f0fef
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.185.79 with SMTP id cn15mr3421632qab.4.1364612147784;
        Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.154.33 with SMTP id vl1mr102176igb.16.1364612147745; Fri,
 29 Mar 2013 19:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 v17ni6816qad.0!nntp.google.com!ca1no17140338qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:55:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <kj5cqn$8q7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=69.20.190.126;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.20.190.126
References: <c988e09f-8532-4840-9749-b61aa39551b4@googlegroups.com>
 <1jtvzi1v65aqm.1k5ejsveno59f.dlg@40tude.net>
 <a767b4a0-cf7e-4974-8b6f-9a6dec117b0d@googlegroups.com>
 <1hvv2kd9smnfx.6spgz9thd1mh$.dlg@40tude.net> <ki8735$he7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <vo941i7imo8t$.1jjjox9r1hkqa.dlg@40tude.net> <kiakpu$98g$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1raubw1sk48ca$.69rdgczvnnf.dlg@40tude.net> <kidie8$6k5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <i93qv6ba3bv0.wuicbsmfm5ha.dlg@40tude.net> <kig50t$9t1$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <2qwq2cdeuvhu$.qtnb8zyhuob9$.dlg@40tude.net> <kij490$bk3$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <a96esjwiniqy$.op3wh7x9wrsl.dlg@40tude.net> <kiqkqk$9u7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1u72u7h5j4jg3$.wlxmaltyzqik.dlg@40tude.net> <kit43q$mj1$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <wdlyfbnwcnp7.10c9btwjmpm7j.dlg@40tude.net> <kivi42$hmu$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <cqf0yy6q930$.1sdzw45bc0c1w.dlg@40tude.net> <kj2e90$9iu$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <byacn0wck9qt$.norrlukaw80l$.dlg@40tude.net> <kj5cqn$8q7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <09f2e5f7-84fe-419b-b27d-207e697c8e46@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this expected behavior or not
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:55:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2013-03-29T19:55:47-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:49:25 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote:
> 
> 
> Claw uses hidden operations on window objects to keep the mechanisms of the 
> message loop hidden away.

Very tangentially on this; what do you see would be the consequence of a system using a loop over a select [for messaging] -- or would it be any different?

I'm really fuzzy on my low-level windows programming and, after reading this ( http://forums.codeguru.com/showthread.php?449338-Windows-message-loop-efficiency ), I found myself wondering; since you wrote CLAW I thought I'd ask.