From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.34.134 with SMTP id s6mr3169091yha.49.1382634350404; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.28.129 with SMTP id b1mr24621obh.37.1382634350079; Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.111.MISMATCH!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!o2no24202726qas.0!news-out.google.com!z6ni90232pbu.0!nntp.google.com!i2no31758879qav.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:05:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8ee20b08-3f10-42bd-8f5d-759bc4beea81@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=199.209.144.214; posting-account=mjE6MAoAAADjsB3NIuKgfHO4u-Elh3cb NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.209.144.214 References: <8ee20b08-3f10-42bd-8f5d-759bc4beea81@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <08c2fdf5-3486-4e3e-b6d2-47536926ca72@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada 2012 grammar From: Marc C Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 17:05:50 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 1653 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1350544208 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17520 Date: 2013-10-24T10:05:49-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, October 24, 2013 11:55:00 AM UTC-5, Dan'l Miller wrote: > Why not base your tool on ASIS? What semantic or syntactic information/analysis does your tool need that the Ada2012 parsing in ASIS in GNAT is impractical for? If I understand the original post, he's looking to extend the language with additional contract-oriented language constructs, not analyze programs.