From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.102.1 with SMTP id fk1mr46316301obb.28.1438243929491;
 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.20.147 with SMTP id 19mr619675qgj.20.1438243929466; Thu,
 30 Jul 2015 01:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!f3no4798540igg.0!news-out.google.com!4ni82933qgh.1!nntp.google.com!z61no4119189qge.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 01:12:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mpbqr2$cnc$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=81.203.145.32;
 posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32
References: <e610ca1e-4df6-4fbb-b3a1-ac35694d9072@googlegroups.com>
 <mp645u$abo$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <2df4698f-4c8e-457c-822d-209cb2f8ab5e@googlegroups.com>
 <mp8r8l$fnn$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <014427b1-ff7a-4a69-82e6-0330af77ed96@googlegroups.com>
 <mpbd8f$re$1@loke.gir.dk>
 <32db2458-1856-4c42-be99-79a381ab617c@googlegroups.com>
 <mpbqr2$cnc$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <0845ac26-78d6-4c3f-98f3-89bd4db4469a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS?
From: EGarrulo <egarrulo@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:12:09 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Received-Bytes: 2065
X-Received-Body-CRC: 714606678
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:194488
Date: 2015-07-30T01:12:09-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 2:25:39 AM UTC+2, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 04:45 PM, EGarrulo wrote:
> > 
> > For me, right now, the #1 annoyance -- which could easily become a deal-breaker -- is that Ada requires manual memory management.  For a
> > language that qualify itself as safe, this is contradictory (outside
> > embedded development).  Other modern languages either offer garbage
> > collection, or smart pointers in the standard library.
> 
> Unless you're implementing a dynamic data structure, it's highly unlikely that
> you need to use access types at all.

Resource management goes beyond dynamic data structures.  At least,
this has been my experience.