From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32fe290813aec20 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lucretia Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New Ada portable GUI Library? Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:22:30 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <083148e5-c5fe-450f-acbb-83391c6483c4@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <6d63c543-0a35-4c39-a330-98c63a24f64d@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1365533.nRhg4MZKNK@linux1.krischik.com> <4e5ffa74-e1d6-4e80-9dd9-824df475a60c@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <970df333-8c12-4f5d-b32b-ded6a84a0195@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.201.91.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1200262952 14306 127.0.0.1 (13 Jan 2008 22:22:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.201.91.10; posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20061201 Firefox/2.0.0.11 (Ubuntu-feisty),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19392 Date: 2008-01-13T14:22:30-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 13, 1:28 pm, Stephen Leake wrote: > Lucretia writes: > > Ada GUI Thick bindings > > ------------------------ > > Ada GUI Thin bindings > > ------------------------ > > C abstraction layer <- Can be provided via C or Ada depending on > > lowest layer > > ------------------------ > > X11 | GtkAda | QT > > GtkAda is already a thick binding. Surely you meant Win32 there? No, I meant it as an option. Like I've already covered in another post, I personally would just use Gtk and wrap it in abstract C calls ready for the thick Ada code. Luke.