From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8fd45d32d7c94df3
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: User Defined Storage Pool : did you ever experiment with it ?
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 15:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <0829d66f-2252-4709-83d9-b8a8f3e44158@y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.vpont3pqule2fv@garhos>
 <ihk0te$e26@news.Informatik.Uni-Oldenburg.DE>
 <op.vpt6fwhyule2fv@garhos> <op.vpt8agtdule2fv@garhos>
 <ihl9et$a1e$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <op.vqhzfuuyule2fv@garhos> <iipr4e$sh5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <b1904d91-bdb3-4ab6-ac17-7a43d0a0de58@8g2000prt.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.151.164
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297123070 25819 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2011 23:57:50
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 23:57:50 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.151.164;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:17928
Date: 2011-02-07T15:57:50-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 7, 3:59=A0pm, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [*] For the sake of comparison, the passive iterator idiom that is
> currently used with containers is not inline-friendly.


Why do you say that?
I personally don't mind doing something like:
Declare
  Procedure Iterate ( Position : In Cursor ) is
   begin
     --- Implementation.
   end iterate;
Begin
  Container.Iterate( Iterate'Access );
End;

as the scope for Iterate is perfectly contained to where I want to
apply the procedure; and even if that scope is too limited [say it's a
commonly used iteration] I could move it into the library's scope.