From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: fac41,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 1008e3,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Thread: 108717,3ef3e78eacf6f938 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gide91fe56a56,gida07f3367d7,gid8d81cdf253,gid5b1e799cdb,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.modula3,comp.programming Subject: Re: Alternatives to C: ObjectPascal, Eiffel, Ada or Modula-3? Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:05:59 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <07c318a0-2644-4c02-9447-ed75d9cb3485@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> References: <4BA8BA91.4050905@cherrystonesoftware.com> <4ba8c0f5$0$6984$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.182.236 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1269356759 16533 127.0.0.1 (23 Mar 2010 15:05:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.182.236; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2) Gecko/20100115 Firefox/3.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.eiffel:567 comp.lang.ada:10670 comp.lang.modula3:136 comp.programming:16444 Date: 2010-03-23T08:05:59-07:00 List-Id: On 23 Mar, 14:24, Georg Bauhaus wrote: > Note: Cherrystonesoftware markets a product that is not available > with Java, C#, or other languages. Are they supposed to make products for those platforms that they consider inferior? Why? I only believe in those statistics that I falsified myself, but in this particular paper they clearly described the measurement conditions and provided source code - it is complete and therefore credible. In this case I see no problem. Or, frankly, I'm not surprised that what they find in their own measurements is consistent with what they market, as apparently both the product and the paper are targeted for the same, performance-aware audience. -- Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com YAMI4 - Messaging Solution for Distributed Systems http://www.inspirel.com/yami4